Salvatore
Pane’s Last Call in the City of Bridges (Braddock Avenue Books, 2012)
Ed Simon
Back
in May Time Magazine ran a cover
piece with the title The Me Me Me
Generation: Millennials are lazy, entitled narcissists who still live with
their parents. If not a corrective to this sentiment then Salvatore Pane’s novel Last Call in the City of Bridges at
least evokes some explanatory sympathy for Generation Y. Pane’s characters,
especially the narrator Michael Bishop, sometimes do seem lazy and entitled
even if they don’t live with their parents (at least not all of them). But what
Pane’s novel largely gets right that articles like the one in Time get wrong, is what the actual
experience of being a millennial is like. Pane accomplishes this with endless
pop-culture references, the use of the Facebook post as a narrative device, and
with purposefully navel-gazing prose, but he always deploys these methods with
an empathetic voice. While the results are mixed, the novel is very much an
artifact of our recent times and that in itself can make it a book worth
reading.
Last Call in the City of Bridges follows several incidents in the
Pittsburgh life of the aforementioned Michael Bishop between January of 2008
and the election of Barrack Obama with several flashbacks to his past. We’re
introduced to his friends–whose dialogue can often run together or seem a little
too stilted or rehearsed–including his dude-bro college buddy Noah, his
roommate Oz who is a pretentious literature grad student at Pitt, a cute
barista at Squirrel Hill’s coffee shop Arefa named
Sloane who is engaged to Noah (and who both Michael and Oz have pined for at
various times,), and Ivy Chase a Pittsburgher who has just moved home who
Michael falls in love with (or who he thinks he falls in love with). The
zigzagging plot works well and goes a long way to recreating the ways in which
memory–especially wounded memory–works.
The plot is standard young slacker
stuff. It’s pretty clear that Pane must have a creased copy of Michael Chabon’s Mysteries of Pittsburgh somewhere. Is
the title character’s name an homage perhaps? I don’t have my Chabon handy, but I think Chuck Kinder is named in the
acknowledgments of both. Like his literary processor Pane makes a good attempt
at capturing the experience of being this certain age at this certain time.
Though he isn’t totally successful, one of the most powerful aspects of Last Call in the City of Bridges is the
way in which it’s able to capture the particular transitory schizophrenia of
those of us born in the mid-80s. Michael was in elementary school when the
Berlin Wall fell, in high school when the Twin Towers fell, and in college
during the nightmare of the Bush administration. And Pane is right to ruminate
that the most notable and universal experience of Generation Y isn’t those
aforementioned events of geopolitical import, but rather the emergence of
Facebook and Twitter, millions of young men and women howling their barbaric
yawps not from the rooftops but onto a computer hoping that someone will
listen. We’re all guilty of that.
Michael is incapable of conceptualizing
or communicating any genuine or authentic emotion without recourse to 80s
movies or video games, the “fragments shorn” against his ruin are Ghostbusters II and Super Mario Bros., fed through an endless way-back machine of
reference upon reference. The novel makes it seem that perhaps the hallmark of
Generation Y is not the usual litany that is trotted out in articles like the
one in Time, but rather that we’re
continually nostalgic about a past we don’t necessarily have a right to be
nostalgic about, that we feel far older than anyone in their late 20s or early
30s should. If you’re unconvinced that this is the idea fix of a generation spend five minutes on Thought Catalog or BuzzFeed. If this novel has any one big theme I think it’s
this: that the seemingly endless technology of personal expression forces us to
speak even when we have nothing to say and as a consequence we have become the
first generation that’s nostalgic for the present. True to his voice, this
theme is offered without judgment.
Sometimes Mr. Pane’s dialogue can be a
little too unnatural or sound as if it is processed all through one voice. The
details he gives become tiresome, like a friend telling you the minutia about
their dream that was very important to them. This is most apparent in sections
where Michael recounts his Pittsburgh experiences, like when he writes that he
“watched a red incline climb out of the decadence of Station Square–home of the
Hard Rock Cafe and Matrix Dance Lounge.” Last
Call in the City of Bridges is filled with moments like that, encyclopedic
recounting of Pittsburgh-facts that read as if they’re more fit for Pittsburgh Magazine than they are for a
novel. And would anyone describe Station Square as “decadent?” A lot of
adjectives could be applied to the Hard Rock Cafe (few that are positive) but
“decadent” calls to mind foppish libertines at a Restoration orgy more than it
does suburbanites eating jalapeño poppers. It’s clear that the characters in
the novel have a clear affection for the city, but sometimes that enthusiasm
falls flat and fails to translate for the reader since it’s always expressed so
literally and so earnestly. With a character as obsessed with hiding his
emotions through irony as much as Michael, the one certainty seems to be his
love of Pittsburgh. One of his tragedies is that his expression of this can
often feel so lame.
But despite this tic, Pane is a writer
of honest potential. When engaging with the foibles of technology that serve to
permanently separate people he writes some scenes that are pitch perfect. The
ways in which Michael and Ivy have a relationship mediated through Facebook,
Sloane’s bizarre performance art project that involves her counting on the
Internet, and a well-written scene where Michael confronts two 11-year-olds
texting each other as they sit across from one another all speak to Pane’s eye
for our present moment. Also, two sections should be singled out for being
particularly well written: “This is How the Century was Born”, an incredibly
moving chapter about halfway through the novel, and the final few paragraphs of
the book where changing a word wouldn’t improve a thing are among the better
things I’ve read recently.
The best sentence, and the truest
sentence, and the most relevant sentence in all of Last Call in the City of Bridges is when Michael says, “I just want
you to know how much this all means.” I think it gets to the core of why Pane’s
characters and why all of us spend hours on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,
Pinterest, etc, etc, etc. It’s a desperate need to breathlessly tell someone
else how much all of this means even if we’re not actually sure it means
anything at all. It’s that uncertainty that Pane has a gift at capturing. There
is a scene where Sloane asks Michael if he’s bothered that Generation Y has yet
to produce truly great art, that “all we’ve managed to do is regurgitate pop
culture on YouTube and Facebook and Twitter.” Last Call in the City of Bridges isn’t
Generation Y’s great work, but it’s a good work, and it’s worth reading. And I
think that Salvatore Pane has something worth saying, so much so that I
wouldn’t be surprised if he at least gets close to answering Sloane’s challenge
someday.
Aubrey Hirsch's Why We Never Talk About Sugar (Braddock
Avenue Books, 2013)
Holly
Coleman
Aubrey Hirsch has written a quick, yet fantastic read. This book
contains a wondrous variety of science fiction, magic realism, suspense and
mortality that will keep you flipping the pages. The author pulls you into each
narrative with her engaging writing creating involvement and genuine interest
in the characters. Imagination is alive in this book. The
topics of Hirsch's stories range from disease to the god particle, to abortion,
and gender identity.
In “Pinocchio”, Pinocchio’s true identity
is that of a woman. He must struggle with telling his the truth to his father,
who had longed for a son. Pinocchio’s approach to his coming out to Geppetto reflects the idea, can God (Geppetto)
"screw up"? Assign someone the wrong physical gender? How does
Pinocchio continue to have a relationship with Geppetto after this revelation?
“The Disappearance of Maliseet Lake” is
a fantastic story of suspended reality. Yes, the lake vanishes. What happens in
this small town, whose economy is based on the lake, is where our story begins.
News of the empty lake spreads and outsiders invade the town. Environmental
protesters, scientists, and tourists all want a piece of Maliseet Lake. How do
the residents deal with this recent loss and then subsequent invasion? Are they
able to sustain an economy in their small town without the lake? Does the lake
ever return? This story is a personal favorite of mine. I really enjoyed the
style and pace of Hirsch’s storytelling as well as the imagery.
My heart shattered as
I read “Strategy #13: Journal”. The
narrator reflects on her father’s multiple sclerosis through medical brochures
and coping pamphlets: her family coming apart, her father deteriorating, and
herself becoming his sole caregiver. The pain of watching someone who once
cared for and protect you, now unable to care for themselves. The slow process.
The emotional destruction. The loss of identity and freedom for the afflicted
as well as caretaker.
In the title story “Why We Never Talk About Sugar”, a
pandemic holds the women of earth hostage by impregnating them with anything they
thought they truly love. Women across the globe become pregnant with and give
birth to items such as diamonds and chocolate. Hirsch resolves this mass
pregnancy by forcing the women to be virtually emotionless and loveless in
order to avoid these pregnancies. Love is met with punishment and consequences.
Only for women. Pregnancy, which was once a joyful event, is now to be avoided,
dangerous and shameful. The narrator’s sister still yearns and attempts to get
pregnant, despite the warnings and stigmas.
Hirsch has a gift for
formulating worlds that take us away from the environment we are currently in.
I read this book during my daily commute. The noise of the bus chatter and
traffic were silenced as I dived into Hirsch’s stories. Her writing is real
enough that you don’t think this is happening in a fantasy world, but perhaps a
parallel dimension. I re-read this book multiple times and I still want more.
Why We Never Talk
About Sugar is one of the first books to be published from a fresh local
press, Braddock Avenue Books. I look forward to possibly purchasing more books
from Hirsch through Braddock Avenue Books. I hope and speculate that she will
continue to explore more topics like genetic engineering or reality
television, and their cultural impact. Hirsch’s writing has left me wanting more. And I eagerly wait.
Della
Watson & Jessica Wickens' Everything Reused in the Sea: The Crow and Benjamin Letters (Mission
Cleaners Books, 2013)
Teresa Schartel Narey
In
their debut poetry collection, Everything
Reused in the Sea: The Crow and Benjamin Letters, Della Watson and Jessica Wickens imagine an apocalypse, where the Internet is the
only place to seek life’s meaning. Watson and Wickens invent the online epistolary by writing poems comprised of exchanges made on
social media between aliases BnjmnR (Benjamin) and alma_crow (Crow). The poems relate each character’s
observations and experiences as they try to navigate the Internet, a
metaphorical sea where bits and pieces of a pre-technological world remain. As
the reader wades through the remnants, she has to wonder: is it possible for
the Internet Age to produce any kind of nostalgia, or are Watson and Wickens right when they say, “maybe we’ve come too far as a civilization?”
Sailing the sea of the Internet is quite
the catastrophe. Human communication is endangered, as “the machine is a better
reader of lips”, and because of industrial noise pollution, there is “a low
mechanical hum that won’t stop.” Early in the apocalypse, Watson and Wickens assert, “I don’t like to think in absolutes / but
no healthy cyborgs will come from this.” Humans have
become so involved with machines and technology that they are evolving, though
the warning in Watson and Wickens’ tone suggests that
this evolution may be pathological.
The making of identity is a critical
component of Everything Reused... In
Benjamin and Crow’s first online exchange, Crow is looking for Benjamin on
Twitter. Unclear of Benjamin’s settings, she asks, “Are you public?” to which
he replies, “I want everyone to see me. Is that wrong?” The strength of their
online presence is hard to determine. In another Twitter exchange, Benjamin
invites @hellabiscuits to be in their book, which
suggests they have an audience. However, when Crow later writes, “The internet
is a pasta strainer and some parts of our lives are water and some parts are
noodles,” the reader has to wonder what has been lost. If the only evidence of
our identities is online, and a search does not return everything about us,
then how can we really know each other? Personal identity becomes a relic,
because Google, Yahoo, or any other search engine can generate what it wants
about us. Watson and Wickens caution that some of our
important qualities could be in the water, and if that is true, then
significant aspects of our identities are being washed away.
Written language also becomes a thing of
the past, as these poets surmise:
this
is mostly what the archaeologists find—contracts,
grocery
lists, receipts.
an
occasional love letter.
in
five billion years
[1]
,
all words will be erased.
As
tangible forms of communication dwindle, Watson and Wickens describe people as bored and desensitized. In one letter, Crow tells Benjamin:
i made a bet
that
nothing interesting would happen
today
/
so
far, i am winning
Later
she reveals, “There are dull days when we drink out of boredom.” The reader
learns that courtesy is completely voided when Crow becomes sick because
“people are coughing everywhere.” She expresses her disdain in a tweet with the
tag, “#coveryourfuckingmouthspeople.”
Most important is what Benjamin and Crow
remember about a time when the Internet was just in its infancy. In the middle
of the apocalypse, Benjamin writes, “In the 90s, we weren’t very advanced.
Still / stringing popcorn,” to which Crow extends, “I do miss the grunge ease
of 1995. Mine spent / in corn mazes and rabbit farms. . . . my best
recollections leave me time sick.” When Crow asserts in correspondence on
Twitter that “the internet is where ghosts live,” the reader begins to equate
the online world with something like a graveyard of sunken ships; we imagine
these artifacts—stringing popcorn, corn mazes, and rabbit farms—floating
around, vastly apart, almost irretrievable. When “no light attracts [Benjamin
and Crow] like the tv” and presumably the computer
screen, how can we believe that there is hope for them to reclaim a time of fewer
distractions and intimate activity?
By the end, it is clear that the world
Watson and Wickens have created is forever changed.
Benjamin writes, “Incarnate us” in his final letter to Crow, suggesting that
their only escape is to become something entirely different. While the weight
of the book is carried in those lines, an earlier poem invites the reader to
consider the impact of online activity before a catastrophe happens:
imagine
a world without transcendent sentences
if
we continue
we
will be forced to live below sea level
spelling
lost to the current
text
me / text me
the
water lapping at our feet
In Everything
Reused... people have sacrificed written language for digital
communication. Among the tangible things remaining are cell phone buttons and
computer keys. People are so entranced with these devices that they too are
almost mechanical. While Everything
Reused... uses email, tweets, and links to inform its readers of the
Internet apocalypse, it makes its point by appearing in print. We have more
control over what appears in print, that is, what can be edited and revised by
our own hands. Once information is distributed online to the masses, it becomes
out of our control, or “lost to the current.” If Watson and Wickens make anything clear, it is that we do not want to be nostalgic for that time
when we had control over our own words.
Ed Simon is a PhD
Candidate in the English department of Lehigh University. His writing and
research focuses on culture, religion, and literature. He has been published in The Revealer, the Journal of the Northern
Renaissance, and The Public Domain
Review among other places. Born and
raised in the city of Pittsburgh, he has always been particularly fascinated
with that strange and wonderful transcendent mysticism which seems to radiate
from his hometown.
Holly Coleman is a yinzer who lives on Troy Hill and works downtown. She
co-manages and emcees the monthly reading series, The New Yinzer Presents.
Teresa Schartel Narey’s poetry and book
reviews have appeared or are forthcoming in wicked alice, No Tokens, Poets’ Quarterly, The Mom Egg, and Apeiron Review, among others. She is a recipient of an Academy of American
Poets University Prize and has a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing from
Chatham University.